Will Motrin prove gone are the days of “all press is good press”?

I think the Motrin ad execs should have read Ryan Block’s (btw, he’s the creator of Engadget) March 13th post The era of “all press is good press” is so very over.

It seems that a few out-of-touch ad execs created a shockingly poor ad campaign that manages to insult mothers in general and give an extra kick-in-the-gut to babywearing moms.

Twitter and the momosphere was immediately buzzing with offended moms expressing their outrage.

If you missed the Twitter action, you can get a recap in this video by Katja Presnal.

If you haven’t seen the ad, Barb from Perfectly Natural Photography typed out the video verbatim and I’ve included it below.

Wearing your baby seems to be in fashion.

I mean, in theory it’s a great idea.

There’s the front baby carrier, sling, schwing, wrap, pouch.

And who knows what else they’ve come up with. Wear your baby on your side, your front, go hands free.

Supposedly, it’s a real bonding experience.

They say that babies carried close to the bod tend to cry less than others.

But what about me? Do moms that wear their babies cry more than those who don’t?

I sure do!

These things put a ton of strain on your back, your neck, your shoulders. Did I mention your back?!

I mean, I’ll put up with the pain because it’s a good kind of pain; it’s for my kid.

Plus, it totally makes me look like an official mom.

And so if I look tired and crazy, people will understand why.

Twitter went wild with rage.

Jessica Gottlieb recommended using a #motrinmoms hashtag for the discussion and “a few hours and two thousand tweets later #MotrinMoms is the #1 search on Twitter, eclipsing SNL for the first time since Obama was elected”.

But then someone posing as a Motrin fan created a twitter account called MotrinMoms and started throwing out snarky tweets.

Bloggers like Adventures in Babywearing responded with blog and vlog entries to remind the world that babywearing should not require pain medication.

So it’s turning out to be an interesting example of “bad press” going viral.

The question is will Motrin benefit from their name flooding headlines, posts and tweets? Or will their mistake prove that the days of “all press is good press” are over?

What do you think?

Comments

  1. says

    I don’t think this is going to be one of those any press is good press situations. Who buys the Motrin? Who are the shoppers in the families? Those baby carrying moms and dads is who. All parents need a boost. We understand the realities of parenthood and it’s not all glamorous but we when we are buying we want to feel good! People aren’t walking away after viewing that ad and saying “Yes, I feel good about what I just saw! I need some Motrin.”

  2. says

    Seriously hoping The MotrinMoms account on Twitter is not actually a rep form Motrin. I think that would make me sick to my stomach – far more than the ad did. Ignorance is one thing, but to know the reaction it caused and poke the proverbial bear with a stick, just for fun, doesn’t seem like a tactic the multi-billion dollar conglomerate (Motrin, Tylenol, Johnson & Johnson, et al) would knowingly partake in.

    I was on Twitter when it really hit the fan and was one of the first to blog about it, and was up for several hours in the middle of it. I would not be very happy if (1) it was a PR stunt or (2) they make the assumption all press is good press. I’m not at boycott levels right now, but that could change if one (or both!) of those are true. I’m not happy about the situation, but I do believe in giving them an opportunity to plead their case.

    I blogged about it here:
    http://shakethesalt.com/2008/11/motrin-the-anti-mom/

    Created a Mr Linky for related blog posts here:
    (Would love for you to join the list!)
    http://shakethesalt.com/2008/11/motrin-moms/

    And posted the video + recap / helpful links here:
    http://shakethesalt.com/2008/11/moms-speak-out-against-motrin-ad/

    Christy
    ShakeTheSalt.com

  3. says

    Great post…I’m wondering, though, is @motrinmoms really a PR rep?

    Just catching up now with motringate…

    I’m of two minds about the whole thing. First, I agree that it is a terrible ad. The only way I was able to hold my baby was to wear her. Babywearing is the best and I can’t imagine how anyone could have a high needs baby or a baby and a toddler without babywearing. The ad is snarky, misinformed, and insulting.

    That said, I am kinda surprised about the level of outrage about the ad. Maybe I’m missing something…it is a mean-spirited ad, offensive to the target demo, and I’m totally for calling the company on it…but just compared to other issues that are important to mamas, I’m just surprised this one is getting so much air time.

    Maybe we can make lemonade, though, and get more publicity for babywearing?

  4. says

    I think the most offensive line is, “Plus, it totally makes me look like an official mom.” To imply that mothers make choices about the care of their children based on trying to win the approval of other people is a low blow. I don’t know of a single mother who would choose baby-wearing just to look good! I’m also sure many mothers have spent hours of research looking for how to best comfort, soothe and love on their kids while also taking care of their own bodies and have made the choice that worked best for them and their babies. To insult and degrade that choice is spiteful and in bad taste – especially when it’s used as an attempt to sell their product!

  5. Rachel says

    Hmmm, yep, I think I will no longer be buying Motrin. I mean, generic is just fine with me and unless they make some kind of a public apology to moms I don’t see why I would spend extra for Motrin.

  6. says

    The whole thing is offensive. The tone, the wording… as though I wear my baby because it’s a fad or fashionable. And as though you aren’t a real Mom if you don’t wear your baby. They really missed the mark with this one!

    Nell

  7. says

    Wow, this is like getting a mention from Jay Leno!

    The problems are too many to list but I’ll start.

    1. Picking on new moms is never okay, give us a few years and then we’re fair game.
    2. Telling us we aren’t good parents is NEVER okay, silly, overindulgent, anything but don’t make us out to be bad moms.
    3. The tone was hideous and misogynistic. If it picked on both parents it could have been under the radar.
    4. Motrin isn’t a product, Motrin is a brand and no one NEEDS a brand. Generic will be just fine in this horrible economy.

  8. says

    Clearly produced by someone who does not GET IT. Moms will be angry and won’t buy it – simple as that. At least I hope so. And Motrin will issue an official apology. Or at least they should.

  9. says

    I think the days of “all press is good press” is definitely over if it involves offending mothers. Especially those of whom voice their opinions often through blogging. It was down right offensive! Babywearing is not “in fashion”…it’s soothing. I’m not an “official mom” because I use a baby carrier, but because I gave birth to my son! Obviously not researched by Motrin…and that is unfortunate!

  10. says

    These are the days of rapid fire social media responses to anything, be it stupid ads, political debates or just watching a tv show. And moms are leading the way. Communication, and getting people to rally around a cause, has never been easier.

    Monica

  11. says

    So this is the comment I just left on Steph’s blog…

    “so will I still use motrin after my next c-section, yes – why? because it works. was I offended, more put off a little. do I think they knew it would create a buzz, even negative one – yes. do I think they underestimated – twitter – maybe. But companies are on to social media and I think something smells funny with this one… VP Kathy is either getting a raise or slap on the hand… I guess we will see…”

    but I do know this – I do think it will shed a positive light on babywearing and sling/carrier manufacturers should be sending Christmas gifts to the executive of motrin!

    Courtney

  12. says

    Le site ou blog : http : //www . sante-orient . fr/ tenu par fabien .
    utjesenovic http : //fr . viadeo . com/fr/profile/fabien .
    utjesenovic est en réalité unn faux site ou
    blog d’arnaque ! ne réalisez votre commande jamais chez lui !
    Je vous découvre en garde puisque j’ai de multiples éléments qui prouvent que
    ce ite est celui d’un voleur , uun voleur nommé Fabien !Je n’ai jamais reçu
    ce que Mr Fabien Utjesenovic devait m’envoyer , ett cela après plusieurs requêtes et beaucoup
    de patience : la seule chose qque j’ai reçu
    de sa part ce sont des mails ridicules et vulgaires ,
    eet je n’ai jamais rjen reçu de ce qu’il devait m’envoyer .Si vous
    ne voulez pas perdre votre temps et votre investissements pour finaleent
    être très déçu évitez à tout prix de commander sur
    ce site de charlatans ! en vérité ce type dde site weeb devrait être fermé le plus rapidement
    possible .Merci de réaliser circuler cette actualité au maximum , auprès des musulmans et des autres afin d’éviter
    que d’autre personnes ne soient victimes d’arnaque
    comme je l’ai personnellement été en achetant sur cee site web de pirate !Sachez que ce Mr Voleur de santé d’orient ne c’est pas contenté de me voler il m’à en plus cruellement
    manqué de respectt eet c’est moqué de moi , comble d’ironie , c’est le
    volé qui se fait moquer par le voleur ! une autre fois faites tourner l’info pour que ce type de brigand du internet soient punis !
    santé d’orient arnaque santé d’orient voleur

Trackbacks

  1. […] 5M4M has posted their take on the Motrin Ad that has been running lately and has offended those moms… I support any mom who carries their babies wherever they could, however I could NOT do it. So more POWER to them. I think Mortin needs to rethink their advertising department. NOT every mom has back pains or neck problems. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>